如何解決MySQL存儲時(shí)間類(lèi)型選擇的問(wèn)題

這篇文章主要為大家展示了“如何解決存儲時(shí)間類(lèi)型選擇的問(wèn)題”，內容簡(jiǎn)而易懂，條理清晰，希望能夠幫助大家解決疑惑，下面讓小編帶領(lǐng)大家一起研究并學(xué)習一下“如何解決MySQL存儲時(shí)間類(lèi)型選擇的問(wèn)題”這篇文章吧。

MySQL中存儲時(shí)間通常會(huì )用datetime類(lèi)型，但現在很多系統也用int存儲unix時(shí)間戳，它們有什么區別？本人總結如下：

int

（1）4個(gè)字節存儲，INT的長(cháng)度是4個(gè)字節，存儲空間上比datatime少，int索引存儲空間也相對較小，排序和查詢(xún)效率相對較高一點(diǎn)點(diǎn)

（2）可讀性極差，無(wú)法直觀(guān)的看到數據

TIMESTAMP

（1）4個(gè)字節儲存

（2）值以UTC格式保存

（3）時(shí)區轉化 ，存儲時(shí)對當前的時(shí)區進(jìn)行轉換，檢索時(shí)再轉換回當前的時(shí)區。

（4）TIMESTAMP值不能早于1970或晚于2037

datetime

（1）8個(gè)字節儲存

（2）與時(shí)區無(wú)關(guān)

（3）以'YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS'格式檢索和顯示DATETIME值。支持的范圍為'1000-01-01 00:00:00'到'9999-12-31 23:59:59'

隨著(zhù)Mysql性能越來(lái)越來(lái)高，個(gè)人覺(jué)得關(guān)于時(shí)間的存儲方式，具體怎么存儲看個(gè)人習慣和項目需求吧

分享兩篇關(guān)于int vs timestamp vs datetime性能測試的文章

Myisam:MySQL DATETIME vs TIMESTAMP vs INT 測試儀

CREATE TABLE `test_datetime` (
`id` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
`datetime` FIELDTYPE NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`id`)
) ENGINE=MyISAM;

機型配置

• kip-locking

• key_buffer = 128M

• max_allowed_packet = 1M

• table_cache = 512

• sort_buffer_size = 2M

• read_buffer_size = 2M

• read_rnd_buffer_size = 8M

• myisam_sort_buffer_size = 8M

• thread_cache_size = 8

• query_cache_type = 0

• query_cache_size = 0

• thread_concurrency = 4

測試

DATETIME   14111 14010        14369     130000000
TIMESTAMP  13888        13887        14122     90000000
INT        13270        12970        13496     90000000

執行mysql

mysql> select * from test_datetime into outfile ‘/tmp/test_datetime.sql';
Query OK, 10000000 rows affected (6.19 sec)

mysql> select * from test_timestamp into outfile ‘/tmp/test_timestamp.sql';
Query OK, 10000000 rows affected (8.75 sec)

mysql> select * from test_int into outfile ‘/tmp/test_int.sql';
Query OK, 10000000 rows affected (4.29 sec)

alter table test_datetime rename test_int;
alter table test_int add column datetimeint INT NOT NULL;
update test_int set datetimeint = UNIX_TIMESTAMP(datetime);
alter table test_int drop column datetime;
alter table test_int change column datetimeint datetime int not null;
select * from test_int into outfile ‘/tmp/test_int2.sql';
drop table test_int;

So now I have exactly the same timestamps from the DATETIME test, and it will be possible to reuse the originals for TIMESTAMP tests as well.

mysql> load data infile ‘/export/home/ntavares/test_datetime.sql' into table test_datetime;
Query OK, 10000000 rows affected (41.52 sec)
Records: 10000000 Deleted: 0 Skipped: 0 Warnings: 0

mysql> load data infile ‘/export/home/ntavares/test_datetime.sql' into table test_timestamp;
Query OK, 10000000 rows affected, 44 warnings (48.32 sec)
Records: 10000000 Deleted: 0 Skipped: 0 Warnings: 44

mysql> load data infile ‘/export/home/ntavares/test_int2.sql' into table test_int;
Query OK, 10000000 rows affected (37.73 sec)
Records: 10000000 Deleted: 0 Skipped: 0 Warnings: 0

As expected, since INT is simply stored as is while the others have to be recalculated. Notice how TIMESTAMP still performs worse, even though uses half of DATETIME storage size.

Let's check the performance of full table scan:

mysql> SELECT SQL_NO_CACHE count(id) FROM test_datetime WHERE datetime > ‘1970-01-01 01:30:00′ AND datetime < ‘1970-01-01 01:35:00′;
+———–+
| count(id) |
+———–+
|  211991 |
+———–+
1 row in set (3.93 sec)

mysql> SELECT SQL_NO_CACHE count(id) FROM test_timestamp WHERE datetime > ‘1970-01-01 01:30:00′ AND datetime < ‘1970-01-01 01:35:00′;
+———–+
| count(id) |
+———–+
|  211991 |
+———–+
1 row in set (9.87 sec)

mysql> SELECT SQL_NO_CACHE count(id) FROM test_int WHERE datetime > UNIX_TIMESTAMP('1970-01-01 01:30:00′) AND datetime < UNIX_TIMESTAMP('1970-01-01 01:35:00′);
+———–+
| count(id) |
+———–+
|  211991 |
+———–+
1 row in set (15.12 sec)

Then again, TIMESTAMP performs worse and the recalculations seemed to impact, so the next good thing to test seemed to be without those recalculations: find the equivalents of those UNIX_TIMESTAMP() values, and use them instead:

mysql> select UNIX_TIMESTAMP('1970-01-01 01:30:00′) AS lower, UNIX_TIMESTAMP('1970-01-01 01:35:00′) AS bigger;
+——-+——–+
| lower | bigger |
+——-+——–+
| 1800 |  2100 |
+——-+——–+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

mysql> SELECT SQL_NO_CACHE count(id) FROM test_int WHERE datetime > 1800 AND datetime < 2100;
+———–+
| count(id) |
+———–+
|  211991 |
+———–+
1 row in set (1.94 sec)

Innodb:MySQL DATETIME vs TIMESTAMP vs INT performance and benchmarking with InnoDB